Home » Uncategorized » How to start off an essay with an eye catching statement about the author book of Matthew?

How to start off an essay with an eye catching statement about the author book of Matthew?





  •   
*My argument is that, Matthew the apostle is not the author of matthew. I just want a statement that will catch my teacher's attention. Lately, Ive been using questions, but I think its getting old, well mine are. please and thankyou.



Similar Asks:

  • Essay structure at Uni level? - I have to write an essay on The Monk. It’s university level and I don’t know where to start! The question is Matthew Lewis”Miscreant, prepare for death” (Lewis) Develop an argument on Matthew Lewis’s use of transgression as a basis for his narrative.Any help on how to properly structure this would be massively appreciated.
  • I need help writeing my purssuasive essay? - ok im supposed to be arguing that sports should be de-emphasized in school but im not sure how to start it nor write my thesis statement have three arguments 1) sports take away money that can be used on new school resources 2) kids who play sports get more favoritism by teachers and students and
  • Is it good to start an Introduction to an essay with a quote? - Introductions:Possiblities for an excellent introduction:1. Current Events2. Personal Experience3. Dramatic statements or statistics ==Shocking or eye-catching4. Interesting background information the reader needs to know5. Excellent quotations that are shocking, bold, or daring *** Do not use more than one in the introductionTo start your introduction begin with 1. Bold statement expressing either neutral feeling or
  • I need help on an essay? - I need a general statement, thesis statement and a sub-thesis statement for this essay. The thing we have to write an essay on is “The protagonist develops relationships with characters who support her along her adventure” See this isn’t a question and it doesn’t have an argument. Can you help me with these
  • Definition of historical essay? - The History Essay FormatEssay is an old French word which means to “attempt”. An essay is the testing of an idea or hypothesis (theory). A history essay (sometimes referred to as a thesis essay) will describe an argument or claim about one or more historical events and will support that claim with evidence, arguments and
  • Research Project? … Vegetarianism.. Animal rights..? - Alright, I’d like to start off by saying that you do NOT have to believe the same I do to answer this question. Its completely fine if you think what I believe is ridiculous or whatnot.Now, I am doing a research project in which I am to research ANYTHING I would like to. I just
  • Im writing an essay about the magna carta and need an opening sentence? - im writing an essay on what it is why is was written and need an opening sentence that will catch your attention i have writers block. and if someone anyone can tell me what life in england was like after the mana carta was signed would be great but that’s not needed it will just




7 Responses so far.

  1. moonjah says:

    The external evidence is ancient and universal that Matthew the tax collector, also called Levi, wrote the First Gospel. Since he was not a prominent member of the apostolic band it would be strange to attribute the First Gospel to him if indeed he had nothing to do with it.Besides the ancient document known as the “Didache” (Teaching of the Twelve Apostles), Justin Martyr, Dionysius of Corinth, Theophilus of Antioch, and Athenagoras, the Athenian quote the Gospel as authentic. Eusebius, the church historian, quotes Papias as saying that “Matthew composed the Logia in the Hebrew language, and everyone interpreted them as he was able.” Irenaeus, Pantaenus, and Origen basically agree with this. “Hebrew” is widely thought to mean the dialect of Aramaic used by the Hebrews in our Lord’s time, as the word is used in the NT. But what are the “Logia”? Usually this Greek word means “oracles,” as the OT contains the oracles of God. It cannot mean that in Papias’ statement. There are three main views on his statement: (1) It refers to the Gospel of Matthew as such. That is, Matthew wrote an Aramaic edition of his Gospel especially to win the Jews to Christ and edify Hebrew Christians, and only later did a Greek edition appear. (2) It refers to sayings of Jesus only, which later became incorporated into his Gospel. (3) It refers to testimonia, i.e., citations of OT Scriptures to show that Jesus is the Messiah. Views 1 and 2 are more likely than view 3.The Greek of Matthew does not read like a mere translation, but such a widespread tradition (with no early dissent) must have some factual basis. Tradition says that Matthew preached for fifteen years in Palestine and then left to evangelize in foreign parts. It is possible that about a.d. 45 he left behind for the Jews who had accepted Jesus as their Messiah a first draft of his Gospel in Aramaic (or just the discourses of Christ), and later made a Greek edition for universal use. A similar thing was done by Matthew’s contemporary, Josephus. This Jewish historian made an Aramaic first draft of his Jewish Wars and then the final form of the book in Greek.

  2. extraditions says:

    ‘a long long time ago, when people discovered weed… there were a couple of idiots…’

  3. vanishment says:

    Moreover, Matthew is written in 3rd person: “And when Jesus passed on from thence, he saw a man sitting in the custom house, named Matthew; and he saith to him: Follow me. And he arose up and followed him” (Mt 9:9). Eusebius (c. 310 CE) wrote that “tradition” is why people accepted that the first book was written by Matthew, the second by Mark: VI.25.4. Among the four Gospels, which are the only indisputable ones in the Church of God under heaven, I have learned by tradition that the first was written by Matthew, who was once a publican, but afterwards an apostle of Jesus Christ, and it was prepared for the converts from Judaism, and published in the Hebrew language. VI.25.5. The second is by Mark, who composed it according to the instructions of Peter, who in his Catholic epistle acknowledges him as a son, saying, ‘The church that is at Babylon elected together with you, salutes you, and so does Marcus, my son.’ [1 Peter 5:13]

  4. uae says:

    “It is physically impossible for the matthew who wrote the book to be the same as the apostle. That could not have happened, and even God would call you an idiot for saying. it. So if you aren’t in support of my work, god says you’re an idiot.”That should do the trick. You need to jab, and when they parry, thats when you thrust low. And when they’re recovering, you give them the coup de grâce to the head: by the time that last sentence is read, you should have pre-emptively given yourself the best marks possible.Its flawless.

  5. methiwal says:

    >My argument is that, Matthew the apostle is not the author of matthew. Correct, they are not the same person.How about “YOU HAVE NOT READ THE BIBLE!”?==>So who DO you think wrote the book of Matthew if it wasnt Matthew? And what makes you think that?We do not know who worte the gospel. Yet, it certainly was not Matthew the apostle otherwise he would have given his own account rather than copy Paul’s and draw off Mark and Q.Not too difficult to work out once you have read the bible.

  6. womanizer says:

    So who DO you think wrote the book of Matthew if it wasnt Matthew? And what makes you think that?

  7. thymene says:

    Matthew: Smurf or Leprechaun?